Denizens - short story collection


How it started:

In 2024 got funding from the Arts Council to write a collection of stories set in my local area of Dublin, inspired by the stories of people who live and work here. My plan was to find and interview ten people over ten weeks in my community of Harold’s Cross in Dublin, and draft ten short stories inspired by their perspectives over that time, and then re-write and edit the stories into a collection. I set out to  find  community participants through personal networks, and ‘cold calling’, to speak to people across as broad a range of age, background and experience as possible; long-term or new residents and workers, and to write fictional stories inspired by the interviews.


How it's going:

It’s been so much fun. Most people have been very open to my approaches, through networks, or people whom I have seen around the area. The only ‘cold’ contact through email which I made was not successful, so I have subsequently approached participants in person.

A neighbour whom I met in another neighbour’s house, somebody I used to see in a local café, the flatmate of a colleague, someone I got chatting to in a local park, many friends and connections of friends or family.

I becane aware of my own pre-conceptions and those of the participants; almost all of them expressed a variation of ‘I don’t know if I will have good stories for you.’ and I did my best to explain that I was not necessarily looking for exciting stories (that’s where the fiction comes in) but to hear experiences which are uniquely theirs, whether they consider them interesting or not.

I expected an older participant who has lived all his life in the area to tell me stories about growing up there, about how things have changed, but he spoke much more about his present circumstances; he spoke frankly about loneliness and family conflict.

I was happy to learn from a participant who moved from another country and culture that she has not encountered racism in Ireland, which was my assumption based on others' experiences.

The plan for rapid-fire interview and story draft per week was a great motivator, but I didn’t manage to sustain that pace throughout the project, because of factors such as participant availability and other projects. After the first four weeks and interviews, I found that it worked better to take a longer period after the interview to read and reflect on my notes, and that sometimes a small aspect of the participant’s interview would inspire a story. For example, one participant has a pet snake, and I wrote a story about the snake. A participant who mentioned how much he and his husband would like to be parents sparked a story about surrogate baby, a PE teacher who talked about ‘refuser’ students led to a story about the self-consciousness and misery that an adolescent feels about compulsory PE. However, one story was very closely based on the participant’s experience and words.

 

Participants were very happy to talk to me about themselves, and seemed to enjoy it, and I have become friends with several of them since the interviews. 


The timeline was ambitious, but it gave the project impetus. Some of the interviews suggested a story easily, and others took more work and imagination. 


As to time of writing, at the end of 2025, I am polishing and editing and re-writing the drafts to make a short story collection.